The United States Presidential election process requires serious adjustments in order to reflect the true voting desires of the American public. While the process works just fine in most elections, in the case of a close election count, the process simply breaks down. Since the 1900 presidential election, only the 1916 election was even closely contested. Even in the 1916 election, one candidate, Woodrow Wilson, won both the electoral and the popular vote. No other presidential election comes close to the results of the 2000 presidential election contest and while none have since been as close, we, as the voting public, need to resolve potential future issues regarding election decisions.
Web Development
Do it yourself…or hire someone to do it for you, just get in done right
Ddemko- Health Insurance Reform Reality Check August 12, 2009Get the facts about the stability and security you get from health insurance reform | Health Insurance Reform Reality Check Shared via AddThis […]
- The United States Presidential election process requires Adjustments May 12, 2009I will argue factors regarding how the American people cast their votes. I have chosen to utilize the writing of Kate O'Beirne, "It's the Zip Code Stupid" along with other reference material as a starting point. […]
- This Nation Needs a National Health Care System to Survive May 9, 2009editorial concerning the necessity of the United States having a National Health Care System […]
- Health Insurance Reform Reality Check August 12, 2009
LinkedIn
My LinkedIn Profiles
